← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7060/2019disposed off

Dr. Neetu Harmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7060 of 2019

1. Dr. Neetu Harmukh, D/o Late Shri Ashish Harmukh, Aged About: 41 Years, Presently Posted As Assistant Professor (Botany) Govt. DB Girls P. G. College, Raipur, Chhattisgarh, R/o Shri Hari Niwas, Near Yash Atta Chakki, Subhas Nagar Durg, District: Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mahanandi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Higher Education, Mantralaya, Mahanandi Bhawan, Atal Nagar Naya Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Commissioner, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Govt. DB Girls PG College Through The Principal, Raipur, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Govt. College, Gobra Navapara, Tehsil Rajim, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. P. Acharya, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ayaz Naved, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 04.09.2019 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1

dated 21.08.2019 passed by the Respondent No. 3, whereby the services of the petitioner have been transferred from Government DB Girls PG College, Raipur, District: Raipur (C.G) to the Government College, Gobra, Navapara, Distict: Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents and the respondents in turn may be directed to decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner, if he so chooses, may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents. Considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order, as per the rules.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Rahul