High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7167/2019disposed off

Smt. Madhavi Goswami v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7167 of 2019 Smt. Madhavi Goswami W/o Shri Jitendra Giri Goswami Aged About 35 Years Presently Posting As Training Officer (Mechanic Radio Television), Government Industrial Training Institute, Korba, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through - Secretary, Skill Development And Technical Education And Employment Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Skill Development And Technical Education And Employment Department Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District - Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Principal Industrial Training Institute Korba, District - Korba, Chhattisgarh., District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Syed Majid Ali, Advocate For State :

Mr. Jitendra Pali, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 20.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from I.T.I. Korba to I.T.I. Kurud, District Dhamtari.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on her being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if she so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5. While deciding the representation, the authorities would take into consideration the substantive appointment of the petitioner, the basic educational qualification that the petitioner has and the post and trade where the petitioner can be accommodated.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved