← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7138/2019allowed

Vandana v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7138 of 2019

1. Vandana, D/o B.L. Banjare, Aged About 31 Years, Working As Lecture Panchayat, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Ahiwara, Block And District- Durg, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Varsha Rani Dewangan, W/o Ashish Kumar Dewangan, Aged About 36 Years, Working As Lecturer (L.B.) Govt. Higher Secondary School, Dudhali, Block: Dondi Lohara, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Vijay Churendra, W/o Yogendra Kumar Churendra, Aged About 32 Years, Working As Teacher (Panchayat), Govt. Middle School, Asara, Block: Dondi Lohara, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Commissioner-Cum-Director, Directorate Of Panchayat, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat Durg, District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer, Jila Panchayat, Balod, District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Harish Khuntiya, Advocate For State :

Ms. Ishwary Grhitlahre, P. Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11.09.2019

1. Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar

Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post.

2. In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with the direction that the petitioner shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by her on a lower post or on the same post.

3. No order as to costs.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul