High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/32/2021disposed off

Manbodh Kumar Nand v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-01-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 32 of 2021 Manbodh Kumar Nand S/o Shri Samaru Lal Nand Aged About 37 Years Occupation - Teacher (Panchayat) Government Primary School, Borida, Block Baramkela, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, P.S. Abhanpur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. P.S. Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. The Commissioner Cum Director Directorate Of Panchayat, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat District Raigarh Chhattisgarh

4. Chief Executive Officer Janpad Panchayat Baramkela District Raigarh Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Atul Pandey, Advocate For State :

Mr. Shakti Singh Thakur, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 29/01/2021

1. Heard.

2. The limited relief sought for by the petitioner in this petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondents for releasing the arrears of pay which the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay granted to the petitioner.

3. According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for an amount of Rs.60,259/- as arrears of pay which till date has not been

released. The petitioner has been approaching the authorities in the department, but till date no steps have been taken by the authorities concerned.

4. Given the said facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would meet if the writ petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondents No.2 to 4 to take appropriate decision so far as arrears of pay that the petitioner is entitled for on account of revision of pay that is taken place, at the earliest, preferably within a period of three months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondents No.2 to 4 so far as order passed by this court is concerned.

6. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rohit