High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6456/2021disposed off

Dr. Pooja Tiwari v. Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur

2021-12-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay Agrawal2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 6456 of 2021 •Dr. Pooja Tiwari W/o Shri R.K. Tiwari Aged About 41 Years Occupation - Ex-Assistant Professor (Commerce), R/o Village - Patewa, Police Station - Nawapara, Tahsil - Abhanpur, District - Raipur (Chhattisgarh) ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur Through The Registrar, Raipur District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

2. The Vice Chancellor, Pt. Ravishankar Shukla University Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

3. Chitrotpala Education Society (Regd.), Through The Secretary, Navapara Rajim, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh).

4. The Principal, Seth Phoolchand Agrawal, Smriti College Navapara Rajim, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh). ---- Respondents _______________________________________________________________ For Petitioner:

: Shri Amiyakant Tiwari, Adv.

For the State/Respondents No. 1 & 2 : Shri Neeraj Chaubey, Adv.

For Respondents No. 3 and 4 : Shri Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, learned Senior Adv appears along with Shri Atul K.Kesharwani, Adv.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay S. Agrawal, J Order On Board 01.12.2021

1. By way of this petition, the petitioner is questioning the legality and validity of the order dated 18.08.2021 (Annexure P-1) passed by Respondents/Society.

2. It is contended by the counsel for the petitioner that being aggrieved with the order impugned the appeal/representation has already been submitted before Respondent No.2 within a stipulated period of 45 days, however, the same has not been decided till date. Therefore, the concerned authority may be directed to decide the same as soon as possible.

3. Counsel for Respondents have raised no objection with regard to the aforesaid limited prayer of the petitioner.

4. In view of above, this Court feels that no fruitful purpose would be served in keeping the petition pending as it can be disposed of at this stage itself. Accordingly, it is directed that the Respondent No.2 shall decide the said representation/appeal as preferred by the petitioner on 13.09.2021 as soon as possible. It is, however, made clear that while disposing of this writ petition, I have not expressed any of my opinion on merits of the case and, the concerned Authority shall decide the same in accordance with law.

5. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay S. Agrawal) JUDGE vivek