Rambharos Jangdey v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7825 of 2019 • Rambharos Jangdey S/o Late Mr Rajaram Jangdey Aged About 35 Years By Occupation Lecturer (Local Body), Govt Higher Secondary School, Balpur, Block- Bilaigarh, District- Balodabazar Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of School Education, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Raipur Chhattisgarh
2. Director Directorate Of Public Education, Indrawati Bhawan, Block III, 1st Floor, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh
3. District Education Officer Balodabazar District Balodabazar, Chhattisgarh
4. Chief Executive Officer Jila Panchayat, Dhamtari Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Shri Parag Kotecha, Advocate For Respondents/State :
Ms. Astha Shukla, PL Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 16/10/2019
1. Limited grievance of the petitioner in the instant case is that his date of seniority in the Gradation List, published in the year 2018, wrongly shows the date of appointment as 16.09.2013, whereas the petitioner has been initially appointed as Shiksha Karmi Grade-I on 16.06.2010. Thus, the petitioner seems to have lost seniority of about 3 years.
2. Given the limited dispute that the petitioner has and the fact that the petitioner has made representation to the authorities concerned.
3. Let the Respondent No. 02 and 03 get the original service record of the petitioner and verify the date of appointment and grant proper seniority to the petitioner from the date of his initial appointment i.e. 16.06.2010
4. Let the Respondent No. 02 and 03 take appropriate decision at the earliest, preferably within a period of 4 months from the date of receipt of copy of this Order. Needless to mention that since the petitioner now stands absorbed in the Education Department. The direction is given to the Respondent No. 02 and 03 to contact the concerned authority in the Panchayat Department also if required to verify the original date of appointment of the petitioner.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashu