← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7160/2019rejected

Rupesh Kumar Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7160 of 2019 Rupesh Kumar Sahu S/o - Shri Nandkumar Sahu, Aged About 35 Years, R/o - Kalartarai, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh

3. Satyaprakash Chandra, Assistant Medical Officer, Primary Health Centre, Chitalnar Sukma, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Paranjpe with Ms. Rashul Bhawnani, Advocates For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 11.09.2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 19.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Primary Health Centre, Megha, Dhamtari to Primary Health Centre, Chitalnar, District Sukma.

2. On a query being put to the counsel for the petitioner she fairly concedes that the petitioner has been posted at the present place of posting for more

than 5 years. The ground now raised is that the wife of the petitioner is in employment at a nearby place and therefore as far as possible husband and wife should have been accommodated at the same place.

3. Given the fact that the petitioner has been posted at the present place for more than 5 years, therefore, it cannot be said that the impugned order is arbitrary or bad in law.

4. So far as the spouse being accommodated at the same place is concerned, the same is within the power of the State Government. Subject to the petitioner's wife making a suitable representation in this regard, the State is directed to ensure consideration of the said representation in accordance with the transfer policy at the earliest.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands rejected. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai