← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7133/2019disposed off

Mahendra Lal Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 7133 of 2019

1. Mahendra Lal Sahu, S/o Shri Jagdev Ram Sahu Sharma, Aged About 57 Years, R/o Draftsman, O/o Executive Engineer, Water Management Division, Code No.- 38, Rudri, Police Station- Rudri, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Water Resources, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Engineer, Department Of Water Resources MRP Basin, Shankar Nagar Chowk, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Executive Engineer, Water Management Division Code No. 38, Rudri, Chhattisgarh, District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

4. Transfer Committee Through The Coordinator, Department Of General Administration, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. N. Naha Roy, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. Adv. Gen.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 11.09.2019 1.

The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 23.08.2019, whereby the services of the petitioner have been

transferred from the Office of Executive Engineer, Water Management Division, Code No. 38, Rudri, District: Dhamtari, (C.G) to the Office Of Executive Engineer, Water Resources Division, Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

2.

Without entering into the merits of the case, counsel for the petitioner prays that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents and the respondents in turn may be directed to decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3.

Not opposed.

4.

Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner, if he so chooses, may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents. Considering the fact that, it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of copy of this Order, as per the rules.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Rahul