Kamta Ram Sahu v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6551 of 2018

1. Kamta Ram Sahu S/o Late Jairam Singh Sahu, Aged About 58 Years, Retired Assistant Manager, R/o Plot No. 22/20, Street No. 05, Matry Kunj, Gandhi Nagar (West) Risali, Bhilai, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

2. Komal Kumar Verma S/o Late Uday Singh Verma, Aged About 59 Years, Retired Manager, R/o Zone No. 1, Street No. 03, New Adarsh Nagar, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

---Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through The Secretary, Department Of Cooperative Development, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Registrar, Chhattisgarh Cooperative Societies, Office At Vibhag Adhyaksh Bhawan, Block - B, 2nd And 3rd Floor, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies, Durg Division, Office At Bunkar Sangh Bhawan, Santra Bari, Station Road, Durg, District Durg Chhattisarh.

4. Chhattisgarh Sahkari Sakh Samiti Maryadit, Sector - 1 Bhilai Nagar, Through Its President / Manager Office At Bhilai Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh.

5. Senior Cooperative Inspector, Office At Joint Registrar, Cooperative Societies Durg Division, Bunkar Sangh Bhawan, Santra Bari, Station Road, Durg, District Durg, Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For petitioners :

Shri P.K.Dhurandhar, Advocate.

For State :

Shri Syed Majid Ali, Dy.G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 05/10/2018 1.

After arguing for some time, the counsel for the petitioner prays for issuance of direction to the respondents to take a decision on the enquiry

which is pending pertaining to the enhancement of the age of retirement of the employees/officers working under the respondents. 2.

The said prayer is not opposed by the State counsel. 3.

Accordingly, let the respondents No. 4 & 5 in consultation with the respondent No.2 take appropriate decision so far as the claim for enhancement of age of retirement of the employees working under the respondents No. 4 & 5 are concerned.

4.

Needless to mention that, this Court has not expressed any opinion so far as the entitlement part is concerned. The authorities concerned are free to conduct an enquiry independently without being influenced by any of the observations made by this Court.

5.

The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Sumit JUDGE