Hetram Patel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 4552 of 2021 • Hetram Patel S/o Beersingh Aged About 84 Years, R/o Village Ragja, Tehsil Sakti, District- Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur, DistrictRaipur (C.G.), Chhattisgarh

2. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of PWD, Mantralaya Mahanadi Bhawan Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

3. Collector Janjgir-Champa, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue) Sakti, District Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner - Shri Kamal Kishor Patel, Advocate. For State/Respondents - Shri Rahul Jha, Govt. Advocate. Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order on Board 12-11-2021 1.

Heard.

2.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is owner of the land bearing Khasra No.24/2, 108, 244, 293/4, 294/4, 354/1, 386, 390/2, 442/2, 566/1, 696, 713, 770, 1210/4 admeasuring total area 1.9710 hectare situated at Village- Ragja, Tahsil Sakti, District-Janjgir-Champa, C.G. 3.

A portion of land belonging to petitioner in the case has been utilized by the respondents for construction of road. Petitioner in the case has been continuously making representation to the respondent authorities praying for grant of compensation on the lands utilized in the construction of road but the representations have never been considered. The petitioner in the case has right to compensation on the land belonging to him utilized for construction of road. Hence, appropriate directions may be issued.

-24.

Learned State counsel representing all the respondents submits that the representation, if any, filed by the petitioner in the case shall be considered by the respondents, therefore, the petition may be disposed off. 5.

Heard learned counsel for both the parties and perused the documents present on record.

6.

Considered on the submissions, the petitioner in the case is granted liberty to file his representation within a period of 15 days. On filing of such representations, the respondents No.2 to 4 shall be obliged to consider on the representation and take decision preferably within a period of 60 days from the date of filing application/representation.

7.

With these observations, the petition is disposed off. Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Aadil