High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6375/2018disposed off

Badri Prasad Chandrakar v. State Of Chhattisgarh.

2018-09-27Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6375 of 2018

1. Badri Prasad Chandrakar S/o Late Nakul Ram Chandrkar Aged About 61 Years R/o Naya Ravan Bhata, Kumhar Bhata, Infront Of Shri Krishna Mandir, Mahasamund, Tehsil And District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh. Through The Principal Secretary Department of Industries, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Chhattisgarh Infrastructure Development Corporation Through Its Managing Director, 1st Floor, Udyog Bhawan, Telibandha, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Tahsildar Tahsil Mahasamund, District- Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Abhishek Pandey, Advocate For State :

Ms. Astha Shukla, Panel Lawyer.

For Respondent No.2 :

Ms. Purnima Singh, Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 27/09/2018

1. The limited grievance which the petitioner has raised is that the petitioner has been appointed way back in the year 1983. In between he was terminated from service. By order of the labour Court the petitioner was reinstated in service and since then he is working. Subsequently, pursuant to creation of new State of Chhattisgarh, the services of the petitioner came under the respondent No.2 and later on he has been posted as Lower Division Clerk on deputation at Tehsil Office, Mahasamund.

2. The petitioner submits that while in service the petitioner has not been granted annual increment in the year 1983, 1999 as also in the year, 2000. the petitioner has made a representation in this regard to the

respondent No.2 which is still pending consideration. He prays for a suitable direction to the respondent to take a decision after scrutiny of his service records whether he is entitled for increments for three years or not.

3. Given the aforesaid limited grievance raised, let the respondent No.2 take a decision on the representation of the petitioner after due verification so far as granting of annual increment to the petitioner which has not been granted for the year 1983, 1999 and 2000. Let this exercise be done within a period of 60 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

4. The Writ Petition accordingly stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder