← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7300/2019disposed off

Smt. Smriti Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7300 of 2019 Smt. Smriti Sharma W/o Shri Harsh Sharma Aged About 56 Years Working As Principal And Posted At Office Of Assistant Director, Samagra, Shiksha Rajya Pariyojana Office Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary/avar Sachiv, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director Directorate Of Chhattisgarh Public Instruction, Indravati Bhawan, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Managing Director Rajya Madhyamik Shiksha Mission Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Principal Govt. High School Adsena, Tilda, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Jaiswal, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the office of Assistant Director, Samagra Shiksha Rajya Pariyojana Office, Raipur to Government Higher Secondary School Adsena, Tilda, District Raipur.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on her being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if she so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved