Jeevan Banjare v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Misc. Criminal Case No.5681 of 2017 • Jeevan Banjare S/o Shivcharan Banjare, Aged About 28 Years Caste Satnami, R/o Village Jhingra Dongri, Police Station Kui, Tahsil Pandariya, District Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant
Versus
• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Station Lormi, District Mungeli, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondent ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Applicant : Shri Devendra Verma, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Wasim Miyan, Panel Lawyer ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board 19.9.2017 Heard the matter finally.
2.
This is an application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. for grant of regular bail to the applicant, who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.307/2017 registered in Police Station Lormi, Distt. Mungeli (CG) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the Chhattisgarh Excise Act, 1915. 3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant has been arrested on 13.8.2017, charge sheet is not yet filed and the applicant has been remanded by Judicial Magistrate First Class, Lormi, Distt. Mungeli. As per the allegation, from the possession of applicant, 15 bulk liter hand made country liquor has been seized. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the applicant is the first offender, he will not commit any offence in
future, as the trial may take some time for its conclusion, he may be granted bail.
4.
Per contra, learned counsel for the respondent/State opposed the arguments advanced on behalf of the applicant on the basis of the quantity of liquor so seized though fairly submits that there is no criminal antecedent reported against the applicant. 5.
Perused the entire material.
6.
The applicant is in custody for one month and six days, charge sheet is not yet filed, the trial may take some time for its conclusion, as submitted, he will not commit any offence in future, though the quantity of liquor so seized is on higher side, upon consideration of the entire facts, I am inclined to grant one last opportunity to the applicant so that he will not commit any offence in future and shall remain peacefully in the society. 7.
Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed.
8.
It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.40,000/- with one solvent surety of like sum amount to the satisfaction of Judicial Magistrate First Class, Lormi, Distt. Mungeli for his appearance before the said Court as and when directed.
9.
It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the Bench by the Court below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicant suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this Court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally; (ii)
the applicant does not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicant is found to be involved in any offence of the like nature; and (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicant remains absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of the above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law, under intimation.
10.
It is further directed that till the conclusion of the trial, present applicant shall mark his appearance before the Station House Officer/IO, Police Station Lormi, Distt. Mungeli (CG) on First and Third Monday of every month at 11.00 am. It is further made clear that if the applicant without any cogent and proper reason does not appear before the Police of Police Station Lormi, Distt. Mungeli as directed, the concerned police may inform the trial Court for the act and if his non appearance found to be without any proper and cogent reason, the instant order granting bail to the applicant shall automatically be cancelled by the trial Court without further reference to the Bench, under intimation. 11.
Registrar (Judl.) is further directed to send a copy of the order to the concerned trial Judge and also to provide a copy of the order to the respondent/State for placing it with the case diary to be returned to the concerned police for compliance and information.
Certified copy as per rules.
Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) JUDGE Bini