Dinesh Kumar Dhruv v. State Of Chhattisgarh
HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 6547 of 2016 Dinesh Kumar Dhruv S/o Aghnu Ram Dhruv Aged About 34 Years R/o Ward No. 39, Mukund Bhawan, Diprapara, Durg, Tahsil, Police Station & District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant
Versus
State Of Chhattisgarh Through Police Station Supela, District Durg Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For applicant - Shri C.R. Sahu, Advocate.
For Respondent/State - Shri Neeraj Jain, G.A. Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 24/10/2016 1.
The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as he is arrested in connection with Crime No.760/2016 registered in Police Station Supela, Distt. Durg- (C.G.) for offence punishable under sections 171, 420, 468 & 471 of Indian Penal Code.
2.
As per the prosecution case, a report was made by Constable Gulab Singh that while he was performing his duty, two persons namely Tikam Sinha and Dhanraj Bandhe came there with their seal and identity card of appointment letter and wanted to take over the charge. On enquiry being made, they could not give satisfactory answer and it was stated that they have been sent by Shailendra Kumar Banjare, Assistant SubInspector to join the duty. Subsequently, the said appointment letter with seal and identity were found to be forged. It is alleged that the said appointment letter were got typed in the shop of the applicant. 3.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that the charge sheet has been filed and evidence would reveal that the applicant who was running typing shop and therefore when some police officer came in
uniform, without verifying proper identity proof/credentials, applicant prepared the appointment letter, therefore he has not committed any offence, therefore the applicant may be released on bail. 4.
Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 5.
Considering the nature of allegations, the role played by the applicant and also taking into fact that the applicant was running a typing shop where fake appointment letter were typed and also taking into fact that charge sheet has been filed and no further investigation is necessary, this court is inclined to release the applicant on bail. 6.
Accordingly, the bail application is allowed and it is directed that the applicant shall be released on his furnishing personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of concerned trial court for his regular appearance before it as and when directed.
Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri