← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhMCRC/5700/2017allowed

Baijnath Sarthi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2017-09-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 5700 of 2017 Baijnath Sarthi S/o Shiv Narayan Sarthi, Aged About 40 Years R/o Jogidipa, Police Station City Kotwali, Raigarh, Tahsil And District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through District Magistrate, Raigarh, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondent For applicant Mr. Vasim Miyan, Adv.

For Respondent/State Mr. Vinod Tekam, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Chandra Bhushan Bajpai Order On Board 20-91. Heard finally.

2. The applicant has preferred this application for grant of bail as he is arrested on 25-7-2017 in connection with Crime No. 154/2017 registered in PS Chakradhar Nagar, Raigarh, Distt. Raigarh (CG) for offence punishable under Section 34 sub-section (2) of the CG Excise Act, 1915.

3. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that after investigation charge sheet has been filed and the same is pending before the CJM Raigarh as Cr. Case No. 526/2017. This is his first bail application before this Court. He is first offender. As per allegation, 10. bulk litre country liquor has been seized from the conscious possession of the applicant. He will not commit any offence in future if granted bail. He may be granted bail as the trial may take time.

4. Per contra, learned State counsel opposes the arguments advanced on behalf of the applicant on the basis of the quantity of the liquor so seized from the applicant. He submits that prior to this incident, Crime No. 1/2002 for offence under Section 34 sub-section (1)(a) of the CG Excise Act, 1915 and Crime No. 849/2012 under Section 13 of the Public Gambling Act, 1867 have also been registered against the

applicant hence instant MCRC may be dismissed.

5. Perused the matter.

6. As the applicant is in custody since 1 month and 26 days till date, charge sheet has been filed, trial may take some time, though prior to the incident, aforementioned two matters have been registered but as one similar offence was bailable one and another matter in connection with Public Gambling Act is also bailable one and that too, they were registered 15 years and 5 years ago, and and as submitted he will not commit any crime in future and considering entire facts of the case, I am inclined to grant one opportunity to the applicant to live peacefully in the society without committing any crime. Consequently, instant MCRC is allowed. The applicant is directed to be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs. 30,000/- with one solvent surety of the like sum to the satisfaction of the CJM Raigarh for his appearance before the said Court regularly as and when directed by the said Court.

7. It is made clear that this order granting bail to the applicant shall stand cancelled automatically without reference to the bench by the Court below if (i) the trial Court finds that the applicant suppressed filing or pendency of any other application for grant of bail before this court or the Hon'ble Apex Court intentionally, (ii) the applicant does not cooperate in the trial; (iii) the applicant is found to be involved in any offence of the like nature: (iv) the trial Court finds that the applicant remains absent without any sufficient and cogent reason. If bail is cancelled automatically in view of above, the Court below may proceed further under the provisions of law under intimation.

8. CC as per rules.

Sd/- (Chandra Bhushan Bajpai) Judge Pathak