Chirkutram Patle v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) No. 7302 OF 2019 Chirkutram Patle S/o Late Bikairam Patle, Aged About 63 Years, Retired From The Post Of Lecturer, Government Girls Higher Secondary School, Pepertarai, Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh, R/o Padavpara, Ward No. 02, Kota, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, General Administration Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

2. Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. District Education Officer, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Joint Director Treasury Account And Pension Bilaspur Division, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Mr. Aditya Tiwari Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 16.09.2019

1. The claim of the petitioner in the present writ petition is for a direction to the respondents to grant pensionary benefits by adding one increment which the petitioner was entitled for on continuous working for one year before the date of retirement.

2. The case of the petitioner is that, the petitioner retired on 30.06.2018 and was entitled for the benefit of one increment from 1st July.

According to counsel for the petitioner, the petitioner was entitled for the increment for the services rendered in the previous year and therefore has earned the said benefit and while granting pensionary benefits, that one increment which fell due on working for one year before the retirement in the previous year, should had been added for the purpose of determining pension and pensionary benefits.

3. At this juncture, the counsel for the petitioner brought to the notice of the court a recent circular of the General Administration Department of the Govt. of Chhattisgarh dated 11.06.2019 whereby the State Govt., as a policy decision, has decided to grant one increment to those employees who retire on 30th June while fixing their pension and pensionary benefits.

4. Given the aforesaid decision of the State Govt. dated 11.06.2019, the respondents are directed to consider the case of the petitioner so far as adding one annual increment to the last wages drawn by the petitioner is concerned for the purpose of determining pension and retiral dues which the petitioner would be entitled for. Let this exercise be completed by the respondents within a period of four months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Khatai