Kulvant Kumar Chandrol v. State Of Chhattisgarh
-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7397 of 2019
1. Kulvant Kumar Chandrol, S/o - Late Mahadeo Prasad Chandrol Aged About 47 Years, R/o - House Of Virendra Singh Thakur (Nirmal Kutir), Bhanupratap-pur, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. Chief Medical And Health Officer, Kanker, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh
3. Block Medical Officer, Durgukondal, District : Kanker, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Somkant Verma, Advocate For State :
Ms. Abhyunnati Singh, Panel Lawyer :
adfasf Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 11.09.2019
1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the impugned order Annexure P-1 dated 23.08.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the Office of Block Medical Officer, Durgukondal, District: Kanker to District Hospital, Sukma, District: Sukma, (C.G.).
2. The ground of challenge is that, the petitioner has been transferred from a core schedule area to another core schedule area which is in contravention to the transfer policy of the State Government.
3. The counsel for the petitioner, on a query being put to the petitioner, he fairly admits that in the district Kanker, he has already worked for some considerable period of time.
-24. Given the aforesaid facts, that, the petitioner has worked for considerable time in the same district. This Court does not find the impugned order of transfer to be bad-in-law. So far as the transfer of petitioner from a core schedule area to another core schedule area. It is directed that the respondents to consider the case of the petitioner, if the petitioner makes a representation in this regard for posting him to a non-schedule area as per the transfer policy of the State.
5. Let this exercise be done/concluded as per the Transfer Policy within a period of 02 months from the date of receipt of representation of the petitioner in this regard.
6. Accordingly, the present Writ Petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Rahul