← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6579/2018disposed off

Smt. Seema Tiwari v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-10-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.6579 OF 2018

1. Smt. Seema Tiwari W/o Ravi Tiwari, Aged About 45 Years R/o Namnakala, Ambikapur, Tahsil Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Panchayat And Gramin Vikas Vibhag, Mahanadi Bhawan Mantralaya, Capital Complex New Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Zila Panchayat, Surguja, Ambikapur Through Its Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Surguja, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

4. Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Welfare, Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat , Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

6. District Education Officer, Surguja, District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh

7. Pinky Sinha, Lecture ( Panchayat ) High School, Sunderpur, Block Ambikapur District Surguja Chhattisgarh., District : Surguja (Ambikapur), Chhattisgarh ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Ms. Rashul Bhavnani, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Chandresh Shrivastava, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04.10.2018 1.

The claim of the petitioner is for appropriate direction to the District Education Officer i.e. respondent No.6 as well as Respondent No.2 for grant of appropriate seniority to the petitioner over and above the respondent No.7.

2.

Perusal of document enclosed with the petition particularly Annexure P/1 dated 16.03.2018 it clearly reflects that the respondent No.3 has already taken a decision of placing the petitioner senior over and above the respondent No.7.

3.

Given the said facts that the order has already been issued by the respondent No.3 in this regard, this court is of the opinion that at this juncture no prejudice is caused to the petitioner until and unless a cause of action detrimental to the interest of the petitioner arises. 4.

Accordingly, reserving the right of the petitioner to challenge the same, if such situation arises, the present petition in the light of letter dated 16.03.2018 issued by the respondent No.3 stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder