High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7466/2019disposed off

Mahesh Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7466 of 2019 Mahesh Soni S/o - Late Shri Govind Das Soni Aged About 57 Years Posted As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, In Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Civil And Revenue District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Agriculture Development And Farmer Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Agriculture Directorate Indrawati Bhawan, 4th Floor, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Deputy Director, Agriculture Janjgir, District Janjgir-Champa Chhattisgarh

4. The Sub Division Agriculture Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. The Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh, District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

6. Ku. Sudha Jaiswal, Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Posted In The Office Of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Gidam, District Dantewada Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Manoj Kumar Sinha, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the office of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Nawagarh, District Janjgir-Champa to the office of Senior Agriculture Development Officer, Block Gidam, District Dantewada.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being

transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved