Sitaram Sande v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7435 of 2019 Sitaram Sande S/o Late Ravilal Sande Aged About 52 Years R/o Government, Ayurvedic Dispensary, Ama Khoha, District Balodabazar Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Family And Health Ministry Mahanadi Bhawan Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. District Ayurvedic Officer Baloda Bazar District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh
3. Parmeshwari Jaisawal Posted As Farmasist At Government, Ayur Vedic Dispensary R/o Village Amakhoha District Balodabazar Bhatapara Chhattisgarh., District : Balodabazar-Bhathapara, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. N. K. Malviya, Advocate For State :
Mr. P. Acharya, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/09/2019
1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 22.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Aamakhoha, District Baloda Bazar to Kodegaon, District Dhamtari.
2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.
3. Not opposed.
4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to
the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.
5. Since the petitioner is being transferred on administrative ground of the State Government, the seniority and promotion of the petitioner under no circumstances shall be adversely affected than what he is enjoying at the present place of posting.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved