Homlal Yadav v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7503 of 2019 Homlal Yadav S/o Manrakhan Yadav Aged About 61 Years Head Clerk District Hospital Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh. R/o Street No. 3 Zone - 1, New Adarshnagar, Police Station Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner
Versus
1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan , Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
2. The Commissioner Directorate Health Services Indrawati Bhavan, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
3. The Director Health Services, Indrawati Bhavan, Atal Nagar Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh
4. The Collector Durg District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh
5. Shri Umesh Chand Deshmukh, Head Clerk, Presently Posted At In The Office Of Chief Medical Health Officer Balod District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Arvind Dubey, Advocate For State :
Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.
Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/09/2019
1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from District Hospital Durg to the office of Chief Medical and Health Officer, Balod.
2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner has got less than 10 months of service left for retirement and thus the order of transfer is bad, as the same is contrary to the transfer policy of the State Government.
3. Considering the short span of service left for the petitioner to retire, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a
period of 10 days from the date of receipt of the copy of this order and the respondents in turn shall consider and decide the same within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the representation.
4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed.
5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved