High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7478/2019disposed off

Dewendra Kumar Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7478 of 2019 Dewendra Kumar Dadsena S/o Shri Trilokee Prasad Dadsena Aged About 34 Years Post Ophthalmic Assistant Officer, Posted At Primary Health Center Kachna, Block Dharsiwa, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh, R/o Satabdi Nagar, Telibandha, Block Dharsiwa, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Additional Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Ministry, Mahanadi Bhavan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director Directorate Of Health Services, Health And Family Welfare Department Indravati Bhavan, Third Floor, Block No. 1, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Collector District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Joint Director Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Raipur Division, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Chief Medical And Health Officer Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Alok Kumar Dewangan, Advocate For State :

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 13/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Primary Health Centre Kachna, Block Dharsiwa, District Raipur to Primary Health Centre, Chhura, District Gariyaband. .

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved