← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7499/2019disposed off

Smt. Sushma Namdeo v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7499 of 2019 Smt. Sushma Namdeo W/o Shri Rajeshwar Lal Namdeo Aged About 60 Years Presently Posted As Supervisor, Integrated Child Development Project, Sarkanda, Bilha - 2, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code - 495006. R/o Mig - II / 04, Nutan Enclave Colony, Nutan Chowk, Sarkanda, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh Pin Code -495006 ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code 492001.

2. Under Secretary Department Of Women And Child Development, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code 492001

3. Secretary And Co - Ordinator Committee Of Senior Secretaries, Department Of General Administration, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Atal Nagar, District Raipur Chhattisgarh. Pin Code - 492001 ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. K. Rohan, Advocate For State :

Ms. Sunita Jain, G.A.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 18/09/2019 1.

The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P-1 dated 21.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Integrated Child Development Project, Sarkanda, Bilha -2 Bilaspur to Integrated Child Development Project, Ambagarh Chowki, Rajnandgaon. 2.

The ground of the challenge is that the petitioner is seriously ill and undergoing the treatment of the Apollo Hospital in Bilaspur. Considering the medical condition of the petitioner and also the fact that the petitioner has reached, more than 60 years of age with less than two years left for her superannuation, her case may be considered sympathetically by the respondent No. 1.

3.

Given the facts & circumstances of the case, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of

-210 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order who, in turn, shall consider and decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4.

The writ petitioner accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Jyotijha