Jairam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR M.Cr.C. No. 7501 of 2018 Jairam S/o Pardeshi Dhritlahre(wrongly mentioned as Ghritlahre in the certified copy). Aged About 23 Years R/o Village Khairi, Police Station Palari, District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer Police Of Police Station Palari District Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara Chhattisgarh. ---- Non-applicant For Applicant:

Shri Yogesh Chandra, Advocate.

For State/Non-applicant:

Shri Ravindra Agrawal,Govt. Advocate.

Single Bench:Hon'ble Shri Sanjay Agrawal, J Order On Board 11.10.2018 1.

This is the first bail application filed by the Applicant under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Cr.P.C.) for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested on 17.09.2018 in connection with the crime No. 486/2018 registered in Police Station-Palari, District-Baloda Bazar- Bhatapara(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of the C.G. Excise Act, 1915.

2.

Case of the prosecution is that on the basis of secret information, a search was made on 17.09.2018, in which 55 bulk liters hand made liquor was recovered from the possession of the Applicant. Based upon which the alleged offence as mentioned hereinabove has been registered while arresting the Applicant on 17.09.2018.

3.

Shri Yogesh Chandra, learned counsel for the Applicant submits that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in connection with the said

crime. He submits further that the Applicant is in jail since 17.09.2018, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

4.

On the other hand, Shri Ravindra Agrawal, learned counsel for the State while opposing the bail application submits that the offence is serious in nature and the alleged liquor was seized from his possession, therefore, the application as framed deserves to be rejected. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the entire case diary carefully.

6.

Taking into consideration the totality of the circumstances and the fact that the quantity of seized liquor was 55 bulk liters and as the Applicant is in jail since 17.09.2018, therefore, I am inclined to enlarge the Applicant on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of the Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that on furnishing a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with one surety in like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court for his appearance before it as and when directed, the Applicant shall be released on bail.

Sd/- (Sanjay Agrawal) JUDGE Nikita