Lakhma Ram Nag v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7899 of 2019 Lakhma Ram Nag S/o Chitaru Ram Nag Aged About 37 Years Assistant Teacher (Panchayat) Office Of Block Education Officer Darbha R/o Village Darbha Village Panchayat Darbha Block Darbha District Bastar Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Department Of Education Mahanadi Bhawan Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Collector Bastar District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

3. The District Education Officer Bastar District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Education Officer Additional Chief Executive Officer (Education) Janpad Panchayat Darbha District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

5. The Janpad Panchayat Darbha Through The Chief Executive Officer District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

6. Primary School Homaras Through The Principal Janpad Panchayat Darbha District Bastar Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Punit Ruparel, Advocate For State :

Ms. Abhyunnati Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 26/09/2019

1. The limited grievance that the petitioner has raised in the present writ petition is for an appropriate direction to the respondent No.5 for taking an appropriate decision in the case of the petitioner, so far as the disciplinary proceedings which has been initiated/contemplated against the petitioner.

2. According to the petitioner, he was placed under suspension way back in the year 2015 and still continues under suspension and that the charge-sheet also in this regard was issued at about the same time and thereafter there has been no further development on the charge-sheet.

-23. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, let the respondent No.5 take an appropriate decision ensuring that the departmental enquiry, if initiated, to be concluded at the earliest preferably within a period of 6 months from the date of receipt of the copy of this order.

4. If the respondent No.5 on verification of facts finds that the petitioner is not to be proceeded further in a disciplinary proceeding, an appropriate order in that regard should also be taken at the earliest.

5. It shall be the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the respondent No.5, so far as the order passed by this Court is concerned.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved