Smt. Kiran Dadsena v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7586 of 2019 Smt. Kiran Dadsena W/o Shir Girish Kumar Dadsena Aged About 40 Years Statff Nurse At District Hospital Durg, R/o L.A. 10, Mukut Nagar, Titurdih, Ward No. 21, Police Station Mohan Nagar, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atalnagar, Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Under Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department, Mantralay, Mahanadi Bhawan, Capital Complex, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Commissioner Health Services, Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. The Director Health Services, Directorate, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. The Chief Medical And Health Officer District Hospital, Durg, District Durg Chhattisgarh., District : Durg, Chhattisgarh

6. Smt. Suman Rani Shrivastava Staff Nurse At Community Health Center, Daundilohara, District Balod Chhattisgarh., District : Balod, Chhattisgarh

7. Smita Joseph Staff Nurse, Community Health Center Nagari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Dharmesh Shrivastava, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 23/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the impugned order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019, whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from District Hospital, Durg to Community Health Centre Daundilohara, District Balod.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on her being transferred

-2and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if she so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved