High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7637/2019disposed off

Deepak Kumar Baghel v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-18Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7637 of 2019 Deepak Kumar Baghel S/o Ram Kumar Baghel, Aged About 59 Years Presently Posted And Working As Head Master, Primary School, Chodha, Block Kharsiya, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Post Office And Police Station Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Post Office And Police Station Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Joint Director (Treasury Accounts And Pension) Bilaspur, Division, Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. District Education Officer Raigarh, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh

5. Block Education Officer Kharsiya, District- Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Dhani Ram Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. P. Acharya, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 18.09.2019

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that vide order dated

4.7.2017, in the case of one Tilak Ram Patel, UDT, the Govt. has passed specific order that who have been appointed on compassionate basis will not be deprived of two advance increments even if they have been appointed after 16.6.1993. He submits that the petitioner's case is similarly situated as Tilak Ram Patel.

2. After having gone through the order dated 4.7.2017, it is found that in the case of one Tilak Ram who was appointed on 27.9.1994 on compassionate basis has been held entitled for two advance increments even though he was appointed after 16.6.1993, on the premise that the earlier circular for grant of two advance increments to those who have obtained D.Ed. at their own expenses would not apply in cases of compassionate appointment. Therefore, in these circumstances, the case of the petitioner deserves consideration.

3. The petition is accordingly finally disposed off with a direction to the respondent authority to examine petitioner's case on parity and grant similar benefit to the petitioner as has been extended to one Tilak Ram Patel, within a period of three months.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Khatai