Rakesh Kumar Sahu v. The State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7844 of 2019 Rakesh Kumar Sahu S/o Shri Dev Narayan Sahu Aged About 31 Years Presently Posted As Ophthalmic Assistant R/o Village Devpur, Post Kandel, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. The State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Upper Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Commissioner Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

4. Director Directorate Health Services, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur And District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Divisional Joint Director Health Services, Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh., District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Chief Medical And Health Officer Dhamtari, District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

7. Shri Devendra Kumar Sahu Ophthalmic Assistant Phc Borai, Development Block Nagri District Dhamtari Chhattisgarh., District : Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Rishikant Mahobia, Advocate For State :

Ms. Ishwari Ghritlahare, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Primary Health Centre, Hasda, Block Magarlod, District Dhamtari to Primary Health Centre, Borai, Block Nagri, District Dhamtari.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred

-2and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved