Suraj @ Vickey Soni v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 7531 of 2016 Suraj @ Vickey Soni S/o Ramji Soni Aged About 26 Years R/o Ward No. 9, Pendra Dafai, Manendragarh, Police Station Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Vishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---Respondent And MCRC No. 7536 of 2016 Deepak Soni S/o Laxman Soni Aged About 32 Years R/o Pendra Dafai Ward No. 9, Police Station & Tahsil Manendragarh, District Korea Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Station House Officer, Police Station Vishrampur, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent For applicants - Shri Jitendra Shrivastava, Advocate. For Respondent/State - Shri Wasim Miyan, PL.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order 29/11/2016 1.

Both these bail applications are decided by this common order as they are arising out of the same crime number. 2.

The applicants have preferred these applications for grant of bail as they are arrested in connection with Crime No.166/2016 (as per challan) registered in Police Station Vishrampur, Dist. Surajpur for offence punishable under sections 458 & 394 of Indian Penal Code. 3.

As per the prosecution case, on 15/07/2016 the applicants alongwith other co-accused entered into the house of Anuradha Asati and thereafter assaulted and looted Rs.36,000/- and ornaments total worth Rs.2,75,000/-. Subsequently, two persons Anil Yadav and Gajanand @

Gajju were arrested and on their memorandum certain ornaments were recovered which were looted.

4.

Learned counsel for the applicants submits that entire allegations are attributed to Anil Yadav and Gajanand @ Gajju and these applicants were arrested only on the memorandum statement and there is no evidence available against the applicants, therefore the applicants may be released on bail.

5.

Learned State counsel opposes the prayer for grant of bail. 6.

Perused the memorandum of the applicants which shows that the applicants have hatched conspiracy and committed loot. Taking into recovery and the evidence available against the applicants, this court is not inclined to release the applicants on bail. 7.

Accordingly, the bail applications are dismissed. Sd/- (Goutam Bhaduri) JUDGE gouri