High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7672/2019disposed off

Sandeep Kumar Ram v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-17Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7672 of 2019 Sandeep Kumar Ram S/o - Dilip Kumar Ram Aged About 40 Years Working As Homeopathic Medical Officer, Government Homeopathic Hospital, Harijan Basti, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Health And Family Welfare Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Under Secretary, Government Of Chhattisgarh, Health And Family Welfare Department Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya New Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The District Ayurveda Officer, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Dr. Divya Chandrawanshi, Posted As Homeopathic Medical Officer, Community Health Center, Lailunga, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh, District : Raigarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Vijay Kumar Sahu, Advocate For State :

Ms. Abhyunnati Singh, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 17/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 21.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Government Homeopathic Dispensary Harijan Basti, Raipur to Primary Health Centre, Rampur, Korba.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that the petitioner is the District Vice President of Chhattisgarh Ayurved Officers Sangh and thereby the petitioner falls within the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from today and the respondents in turn shall decide the representation within a further period

of 45 days from the date of receipt of representation. Meanwhile, there shall be a stay of the effect and operation of the impugned order, so far as the petitioner is concerned.

4. The authorities concerned are also directed to verify the fact whether the petitioner does fall under the protected category under the transfer policy of the State Government or not.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved