← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6721/2018disposed off

Satvinder Singh Bhatia v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6721 of 2018 Satvinder Singh Bhatia S/o Shri Mahendra Singh, Aged About 29 Years, R/o Bhawan No. 12B, Nehru, Ward No. 12, Budhwari Para, Near Rajendra Kirana Store, Dongargarh, District Rajnandgaon Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Commerce And Industry, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Police Station Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Public Service Commission, Civil Lines Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Mayank Ransingh S/o Kishore Ransingh, Aged About 30 Years, R/o C-54, H T P C Colony Korba, West Darri Korba, District Korba Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For petitioner :

Shri Mayank Chandrakar, Advocate.

For State :

Shri D. Wankhede, Govt. Advocate For Respondent no.3 :

Ms. Sharmila Singhai, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 04/12/2018 1.

The relief sought for by the petitioner in present case is for a direction to the respondents to complete the recruitment process to the post of Assistant Director Industry/Management (Commerce & Industrial Department).

2.

The case of the petitioner was placed on the waiting-list but could not be considered for want of necessary recommendation by Public Service

Commission (PSC). The PSC/respondent No. 2 have now come up with a stand through their reply that they have already extended the validity period for the waiting-list till 11.02.2019 and the recommendation also has been made in this regard wherein the name of the petitioner also finds place i.e. the list of eligible candidates from the waiting list to the Department of Commerce and Industries on 18.07.2018.

3.

Giving the aforesaid submission taken by the PSC, let respondent/State take an appropriate decision at the earliest within validity period of the wait list. It is the responsibility of the petitioner to apprise the order passed by this Court to respondent No. 1. 4.

Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) JUDGE Bhola