Smt. Neelam Kesharwani v. State Of Chhattisgarh
NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5018 of 2021 Smt. Neelam Kesharwani W/o Ghanshyam Kesharwani Aged About 39 Years R/o Near 36 Mall, Bilaspur , Tahsil And District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner
Versus
1.
State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue, Mahanadi Bhavan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh 2.
Collector, Mungeli, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh 3.
Tahsildar Lormi, District Mungeli Chhattisgarh ----Respondents For Petitioner :
Mr. Amit Kumar, Advocate For State :
Mr. Hariom Rai, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Mr. Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 08/12/2021 1.
Heard on petition.
2.
It is submitted by the counsel for the petitioner that the petitioner has purchased land bearing Khasra No. 394/1, 392, 393 and 304/1, measuring 0.24, 1.40, 1.86, 0.03 total area 3.50 total hectare 1.429 situated in Village Sardha, District Mungeli by a registered sale deeds dated 18.08.2021 & 19.08.2021. The application for mutation has been filed before the Respondent No.3 through online portal. The application has been received by office of Respondent No.3 but the proceeding of mutation is pending without any progress, therefore, this petition is filed with prayer for issuance of direction to expedite
the proceeding of mutation proceeding pending before the Respondent No.3.
3.
State counsel opposes the submission and submits that the proceeding is likely to take some time and it will be concluded in its due course, therefore, there is not requirement to issue any notification.
4.
After considering the submissions and looking to the fact that the petitioner's application of mutation proceeding is pending before the Respondent No.3, this petition is disposed off at motion stage. 5.
The Respondent No. 3 is directed to expedite the mutation proceeding and conclude the same within 90 days from the date of receipt of copy of this order. The petitioner is also directed to move an appropriate application before the Tehsildar in respect of his claim for acquisition proceedings.
6.
With the aforesaid observation/direction, the writ petition stands disposed off.
Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved