Smt. J. Markam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7823 of 2019 Smt. J. Markam W/o Salik Ram Markam Aged About 37 Years Occupation Gramin Swasthya Sanyojak (Mahila) (Mpw) Posted At Sub Health Centre Beltara District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. Presently R/o Ward No. 15 Mendrapara Ratanpur Post And Police Station Ratanpur Tahsil Kota District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary Health And Family Welfare Department Mantralaya Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Director Health Services Directorate Indrawati Bhawan Nawa Raipur Atal Nagar Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Chief Medical And Health Officer District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Block Medical Officer Block Bilha District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

5. Block Medical Officer Block Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

6. Smt. Gurwari Sahu Working As A Gramin Swasthya Sanyojak (Mahila) Mpw And Presently Posted At Sub Health Centre Awrid Community Health Centre Navagarh District Jangir Champa Chhattisgarh.

---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pushpendra Kumar Patel, Advocate For State :

Mr. Anshuman Shrivastava, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 23.08.2019 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from Sub Health Centre Beltara, District Bilaspur to Sub Health Centre Avrid, Community Health Centre, Nawagarh, District JanjgirChampa.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on her being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

-23. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if she so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

5. While deciding the representation, the authorities would take note of the fact whether the seniority of the petitioner is maintained district-wise and whether the seniority of the petitioner would be affected or not. In case if it is found that the petitioner is district cadre employee, then clause 5 of the order of transfer itself would become automatically applicable upon the petitioner.

6. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed of.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved