Smt. Yeneshwari Deshmukh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6657 of 2018

1. Smt. Yeneshwari Deshmukh W/o Shri Manoj Kumar Deshmukh, Aged About 37 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Gheena, Block Doundilohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

2. Smt. Durgavati Namdev W/o Shri Dinesh Namdev, Aged About 47 Years, Working As Teacher Panchayat And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Gheena, Block Doundilohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Chunnilal Thakur S/o Shri Sunder Lal Thakur, Aged About 43 Years, Working As Lecturer Panchayat And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Gheena, Block Doundilohara, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

4. Robert Sanjeev Ekka S/o Shri H. Ekka, Aged About 45 Years, Working As Lecturer (L. B. T.), And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivani, (Marwahi), District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

5. Satish Kumar Shukla S/o Shri Balkaran Shukla Aged About 35 Years Working As Lecturer Panchayat And Posted At Govt. Higher Secondary School Shivani, Marwahi, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, New Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Chief Executive Officer Zila Panchayat Balod, District Balod, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Panchayat Bilaspur, District Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents

For Petitioners :

Shri G. P. Mathur, Advocate For State :

Shri S. P. Kale, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 06.10.2018 Heard.

1.

Learned counsel for the parties would submit that the issue raised in this petition is squarely covered by order dated 28.11.2017 passed by this Court in WPS No.2530 of 2017 (Mukesh Kumar Patel and another Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and another) and batch of petitions wherein the circular dated 23.04.2016 has been quashed, petitions allowed and it has been declared that the petitioners therein shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service by including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 2.

In view of the aforesaid submission and the impugned order and action is based on circular dated 23.04.2016 which has been quashed in the case referred to herein above, the petition also deserves to be allowed with a direction that the petitioners shall be entitled to obtain the benefit of revised pay-scale on completion of 8 years service including the services rendered by them on a lower post or on the same post. 3.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola