Bablu Chandravanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRCA No. 1267 of 2016 • Bablu Chandravanshi S/o Dilip Chandravanshi Aged About 26 Years R/o Village- Bano, Police Station- Pipariya, TahsilKawardha, District- Kabirdham, Chhattisgarh --- Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh through: Station House Officer, Police Station- Civil Line, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh --- Respondent For the applicant :

Mr. Malay Shrivastava, Advocate.

For the State :

Mr. N.K. Mehta, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 24.03.2017

1. Apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No. 397/2016 registered at Police Station Civil Line, Raipur, Distt. Raipur (C.G) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 467, 468, 471, 411, 34 of IPC, the applicant has filed this application u/s 438 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.

2. As per the prosecution case, the applicant alongwith other accused on the basis of forged Aadhar Card, electricity bill and forged Cheques of HDFC Bank had taken LED T.V., and further on the basis of forged documents obtained motorcycle TV, Fridge etc.

3. Learned counsel for the applicants would submit that the allegations are attributed to Yogendra and thepresent applicant has not committed any offence and the applicant has been falsely implicated, therefore, he may be enlarged on bail.

4. Per contra, learned State Counsel opposes the prayer.

5. Perused the case diary documents. It appears that on the basis of forged ID and other documents, the goods were purchased. Further, the charge sheet has been filed wherein the applicant is shown to have been absconded. Taking into such facts and circumstances of the case, I am of the view that it is not a case where the benefit of section 438 Cr.P.C., can be extended. Accordingly, this bail application is dismissed. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE R a o