← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWA/522/2019withdrawn

Anand Kumar Choubey v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-06Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Appeal No. 522 of 2019 (Arising out of order dated 26.07.2019 passed in WPS No.5681 of 2018 by the learned Single Judge) Anand Kumar Choubey S/o Pramod Choubey Aged About 29 Years Occupation Guest Faculty (Hindi) At Government Larangsai Post Graduate College Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---- Appellant

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh Through The Principal Secretary, Department of Higher Education Mantralaya Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. The Commissioner Higher Education Block C-3, 2nd And 3rd Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Government Larangsai Post Graduate College Ramanujganj, District Balrampur-Ramanujganj, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ________________________________________________________________ For Appellant : Shri Jeet Patel, Advocate For Respondent/State : Shri Vikram Sharma, Dy. Govt. Advocate _________________________________________________________________ Hon'ble Shri P. R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge Order on Board P.R. Ramachandra Menon, Chief Justice 06.01.2020 1.

The Appellant has moved this Court with the following prayer: "In view of the facts and circumstances of the case as mentioned above, it is most humbly and respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow the instant appeal and set aside the impugned judgment and order dated 26.07.2019 (Annexure A-1)

and quashed the advertisement dated 04.09.2019 passed by the respondent No.3, in the interest of justice."

2.

When the matter is taken up for consideration, learned counsel for the Appellant seeks for permission to withdraw this appeal with liberty to file fresh appeal by causing his grievance to be moulded in an appropriate manner.

3.

Prayer is allowed.

4.

The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn with aforesaid liberty. Sd/- Sd/- (P.R. Ramachandra Menon) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Yogesh