High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6647/2021disposed off

Tarachand Markam v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2021-12-06Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal2 pages

-1HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6647 of 2021

1. Tarachand Markam S/o Shri Ramji Markam, Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School Murmura, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

2. Tukeshwar Prasad Sahu, S/o Shri Sewa Ram Sahu, Aged About 41 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School Naginbahra, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh

3. Tijau Ram Sahu, S/o Manohar Lal Sahu, Aged About 42 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School Bodrabandha, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband (Chhattisgarh)

4. Rakesh Kumar Dewangan, S/o Shri Nathu Ram Dewangan, Aged About 45 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School Gaydabari, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh

5. Ved Ram Dhi Dhi, S/o Shri Mani Ram Dhi Dhi, Aged About 38 Years Presently Working As Teacher (L.B.) Govt. Middle School Dwartara, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Panchayat And Rural Development, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District Raipur (Chhattisgarh)

2. Director, Office Of Directorate Of Panchayat, Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Executive Office, Zila Panchayat Gariyaband, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh, District : Gariyabandh, Chhattisgarh

4. Block Education Officer, Block Chhura, District Gariyaband Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Vinod Kumar Sharma, Advocate For State/ Respondents :

Ms. Beenu Sharma, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 06.12.2021 Heard

1. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that they may be allowed to make representation to Respondent No. 3 for redressal of their

-2grievance for arrears of revised pay scale and Respondent No. 3 may be directed to decide the same.

2. Perused the documents and heard learned counsel for the petitioner.

3. Be that as it may, Respondent No. 3 is directed to decide the representation of the petitioners within 4 weeks from the date of receipt of the representation in accordance with law with a speaking order.

4. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Jyoti