High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPC/2871/2018disposed off

Singh And Company v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-12-07Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPC No. 2871 of 2018 • Singh & Company Through Its Proprietor- Randhir Kumar Singh, S/o Gaya Singh, Aged About 35 Years, R/o E-10, Sector-02, Agroha Society, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Excise, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur, District: Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Collector District - Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

3. Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited Raipur, Through - General Manager, CSMCL, Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

4. Chhattisgarh State Marketing Corporation Limited Rajnandgaon, Through - Deputy General Manager, CSMCL, Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

5. Additional Collector Rajnandgaon, District - Rajnandgaon (CG)

6. District Transport Officer Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

7. District Treasury Officer Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

8. District Marketing Officer Collectorate Campus Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

9. Deputy Superintendent Of Police Rajnandgaon, Chhattisgarh.

10. Shri Sai Udyog Village - Podi, District - Korba (CG) ---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Kishore Bhaduri, Advocate For Respondent No.1 to 9 :

Shri Prasun Bhaduri, Govt. Advocate For Respondent No.10 :

Shri Bhaskar Pyasi, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu,J Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, CJ 07/12/2018

1. The dispute in relation to the decision dated 25.9.2018 contained in Annexure P-1 by virtue of which award of contract for transportation of country and foreign liquor for the financial year 2018-19 is not required to be adjudicated now at this belated hour since the contract had already

been awarded to a private respondent and the contract will be over in the coming few months.

2. We also do not fail to take notice of the fact that it was only after the intervention of the Court that except for District Rajnandgaon, the appellant had been awarded contract for transportation in question for most of the districts of the State.

3. Writ application therefore stands disposed off without interfering with the order impugned.

Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge roshan/-