High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7849/2019disposed off

G.K. Mishra v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-25Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 7849 of 2019 G.K. Mishra S/o Late Shri R.S. Mishra Aged About 57 Years Working As Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Scheduled Caste And Scheduled Tribes Development, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Collector Korba District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

3. Shri C.L. Dhritlahre Working As Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Pendra, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. Pranjal Shukla, Advocate For State :

Mr. Ashutosh Mishra, P.L.

Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Dy. A.G.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 25/09/2019

1. The challenge in the present writ petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 13.09.2019, whereby the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Chief Executive Officer, Janpad Panchayat Kartala, District Korba to the office of the Assistant Commissioner, Tribal Development, Bilaspur. .

2. The main ground of challenge in the present writ petition is that the order of transfer has been made during the ban period. According to the petitioner the ban period was till 23.08.2019, but the impugned order of transfer in the present case has now been passed on 13.09.2019 i.e. during the ban period.

3. Given the said facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation to the respondents within a period of 10 days from the date of receipt of the copy

-2of this order and the respondents in turn shall decide the same within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of the representation.

4. Meanwhile, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid observations, the present writ petition stands disposed off.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved