Smt. Bhawana Sharma v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7166 of 2018

1. Smt. Bhawana Sharma D/o Shri Vinod Pandey, Aged About 35 Years R/o H. No. 51/1925, Dewangan Gali, Lakhe Nagar, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Sanjeet Sharma S/o Basant Kumar Tripathi, Aged About 29 Years R/o Q No. 54/473 Teachers Colony, Near Gayatri Convent School, Dunganiya, Sunder Nagar, Bindrawangarh, Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Breenisha Ekka D/o Shri P.S. Ekka, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Q.No. GN/20, Behind Poly College Rudri, Dhamtari, Chhattisgarh

4. Suchita Minj D/o Patras Minj, Aged About 30 Years, R/o Bhandaripara Bamba Jashpur, Chhattisgarh

5. Ravishankar Sahu S/o Shri Lala Ram Sahu, Aged About 28 Years, R/o Sai Vihar Colony, Municipal Council Tifra Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, Disrtict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. The Director, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, Disrtict- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. The Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur Through The Controller, Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Vyapam Bhawan, Narth Block, Sector- 19, Naya Rapur, Chhattisgarh

4. Mr. Santosh Singh Thakur S/o Late Shri Sitaram Thakur, Aged About 43 Years Occupation- Assistant Grade-2, Directorate, Public

Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

5. Mr. Ram Kumar Jagat, Aged About 52 Years Occupation- Assistant Grade-2, Directorate, Publilc Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, DisrtictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

6. Mr. Hemlal Sahu, Aged About 57, Occupation-Assistant Grade-2, Directorate, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

7. Mr. Manoj Kumar Yadav, Aged About 42 Years, OccupationAssistant Grade-3, Directorate, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh

8. Mr. Maniram Verma, Aged About 44 Years, Occupation-Assistant Grade-3, Directorate, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, DistrictRaipur, Chhattisgarh

9. Mr. Anas Kumar Sahu, Aged About 38, Occupation- Assistant Grade3, Directorate, Public Instruction Department, Indrawati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, P.S. Rakhi, Naya-Raipur, District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate For State :

Shri Majid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order On Board 30.10.2018 1.

The grievance of the petitioners is that they were originally working

against the District level posts. However, subsequently, the respondents have called upon the petitioners and posted them at directorate whereupon the petitioners were working for quite sometime. The petitioners have also moved applications for absorption.

2.

Contention of the counsel for the petitioners is that the Department has already absorbed many of the persons but for some reasons the case of the petitioners has not been finalized and their case is pending consideration before the authorities. He further submits that meanwhile, the respondents have now issued an advertisement and there is all likelihood that the posts against which the petitioners are working would be filled up by the regular employees and in the course, the petitioners would lose their seniority at the District Level and also would not get the benefit at the directorate.

3.

Given the limited grievance which the petitioners have raised, let the respondent no.2 take a decision on the pending representation of the petitioners at the earliest preferably before the recruitment process is completed against the advertisement which has already been published. Let the petitioners make available the order passed by this Court to the respondent no.2 along with any other representation if they intend to file at the earliest.

4.

With the aforesaid observation, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- P. Sam Koshy Judge Bhola