Mohit Ram Suryavanshi v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT of CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 9564 of 2021 • Mohit Ram Suryavanshi S/o Girdhari Suryavanshi aged about 45 Years R/o Village Baniyadih, P.S. Koni, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh. ----Applicant

Versus

• State of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

---- Non-applicant For Applicant : Mr. Pradeep Jogi, Advocate For Non-applicant/State : Mr. Seema Dixit, Panel Lawyer Single Bench: Hon'ble Shri Parth Prateem Sahu, Judge

ORDER

20/12/2021 1.

Applicant has filed this application under Section 439 of CrPC for grant of regular bail as he has been arrested in connection with Crime No. 522/2021 registered at Police Station Seepat, District Bilaspur (C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 34(2) of Chhattisgarh Excise Act.

2.

Case of prosecution is, that police upon receiving secret information on 29.10.2021, intercepted motor cycle driven by applicant. During search police seized 15 bulk liters of hand made (mahua) liquor from possession of applicant. Based upon the seizure aforementioned crime is registered against applicant and he was arrested on 29.10.2021.

3.

Learned counsel for the applicant would submit that applicant has not committed any offence as alleged against him, he has been falsely implicated in the crime, liquor allegedly seized was not from conscious possession of applicant. He also submits that there is no other criminal antecedents of similar nature against him, he is in jail since 29.10.2021. Offence is triable by Magistrate which may take some time to conclude, hence, he may be released on bail.

4.

Learned State counsel, while opposing the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, would submit that police has seized illicit liquor from possession of applicant. However, upon asking with regard to criminal antecedent against applicant, she submits that there is no mention of other criminal antecedent of similar nature against applicant in the case diary. 5.

I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6.

Taking into consideration, nature of allegations, facts and circumstances of the case, there is no other criminal antecedents against applicant as stated by learned counsel for the parties, offence to be triable by Magistrate, without commenting anything on merits, I am inclined to allow the bail application. 7.

Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on regular bail, upon furnishing a bail bond in the sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in the like sum to the satisfaction of the Court on the conditions thata) Applicant shall appear before the Trial Court regularly on each and every date, unless exempted from appearance. b) The applicant shall not, in any manner, tamper with the prosecution witnesses.

c) If the applicant is found involved in similar offence in the future, it will be open for the State to apply for cancellation of Bail.

Certified copy as per rules.

Sd/- (Parth Prateem Sahu) Judge P a w a n