Suryakant Kashyap v. State Of Chhattisgarh

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WRIT PETITION (S) NO.7202 OF 2018

1. Suryakant Kashyap S/o Late Shri Shiv Prasad Kashyap Aged About 41 Years R/o Village And Post Taga, Tahsil Akaltara District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh.

...Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Panchayat And Rural Development , Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, Police Station Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. The Secretary School Education Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, Police Station Rakhi, Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. The Director Public Instruction Department, Indravati Bhawan, Post Office Mantralaya, Police Station Rakhi, Naya- Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. The Chief Executive Officer District Panchayat Janjgir Champa District Janjgir Champa Chhattisgarh., District : Janjgir-Champa, Chhattisgarh

5. The Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board Raipur Chhattisgarh Through The Controller , Chhattisgarh Professional Examination Board, Vyapam Bhawan, North Block, Sector- 19, Naya Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner :

Shri Vipin Tiwari, Advocate.

For Respondent-State :

Shri Mazid Ali, Dy. Govt. Advocate.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30.10.2018

1. The grievance of the petitioner in the instant petition is the order of suspension issued by the respondent No.4 on 31.10.2017.

2. The counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner was placed under suspension on certain false complaint made against him so far as his appointment is concerned. He further submits that subsequent to his being placed under suspension, the department has conducted an enquiry and enquiry report has also been submitted by the enquiry officer to the competent authority but till date no final decision has been taken on the said enquiry report and the petitioner continues to be placed under suspension.

3. Given the aforesaid facts and circumstances of the case, this court is of the opinion that ends of justice would be served if this petition is disposed of with a direction to the respondent Nos.3 & 4 to look into the grievance of the petitioner of his being continued under prolonged suspension inspite of fact that the department has already got the matter examined and an enquiry report has already been submitted before the competent authority. Let this exercise be concluded by the respondents No.3&4 within a period of 90 days from today.

4. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy Judge inder