← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/7967/2019disposed off

Naresh Lal Nag v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-09-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

-1NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 7967 of 2019 Naresh Lal Nag S/o Shri Kalam Nag Aged About 40 Years Presently Posted As Forester, Saraipali Circle, Saraipali Range Office, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner(s)

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Throgh Secretary, Forest Department, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Under Secretary Forest Department, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Principal Chief Conservator Of Forest Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

4. Chief Conservator Of Forest Raipur Circle, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

5. Chief Conservator Of Forest Jagadalpur Chhattisgarh.

6. Divisional Forest Officer Mahasamund, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh

7. Range Officer Forest Range, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :

Shri Raghvendra Pradhan, Advocate.

For State :

Ms. Abhyunnati Singh, Panel Lawyer.

Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 30.09.2019

1. Challenge in the present writ petition is to order of transfer dated 23.08.2019 whereby the petitioner has been transferred from Saraipali to Sukma.

2. The contention of the petitioner is that he is working as a Forester and seniority of the petitioner is maintained at Circle wise and if the petitioner is sent to out of Circle, he may have an adverse impact so far as seniority and promotional prospects are concerned.

3. Given the aforesaid facts, let the petitioner make a detailed representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of 10 day from today, who

-2in turn, shall consider and decide the same at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as petitioner is concerned.

5. The writ petition accordingly stands disposed of. Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge inder