High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8136/2019disposed off

Lobhan Singh v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2019-10-14Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8136 of 2019 Lobhan Singh, S/o. Kunwar Singh, Aged About 32 Years, Working As Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, Bagbahara, Presently Residing At Village Parsadih, Post Maldi, District Balodabazar-Bhatapara, Chhattisgarh. ---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Principal Secretary, Agriculture Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh.

2. Deputy Director, Agriculture, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

3. Sub Divisional Officer (Agriculture) Mahasamund, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

4. Senior Agriculture Extension Officer, Block Bagbahara, District Mahasamund, Chhattisgarh.

---- Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. T.K.Jha, Advocate For Respondents :

Ms. Richa Shukla, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order On Board 14.10.2019 Heard.

1. Grievance of the petitioner is that while working as Rural Agriculture Extension Officer, he seriously fell ill in the month of February 2019, therefore, he applied for leave on the medical ground, however, since there was some technical glitches appeared, therefore, the application for leave was returned. Subsequently, another application was filed with all the documents and after availing the leave when the petitioner went to join the office, he was not allowed to join. The petitioner submits that he has already made a representation before the S.D.O. Agriculture as also the Collector, however, without any rhyme and reason, the same is kept in abeyance, therefore, the same may be directed to decide so that the petitioner may

further seek his remedy or may join the office.

2. Considering the grievance of the petitioner and after perusal of the Annexure P-6 dated 15.07.2019 and Annexure P-7 dated 06.08.2019, the representation shall be decided within a further period of 45 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order so that the petitioner may evaluate his position so as to seek further remedy, if so advised.

3. With the aforesaid observation, the petition stands disposed of. Sd/- Goutam Bhaduri Judge Ashok