High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6876/2018disposed off

D.S. Sidar v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-10-12Hon'Ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 6876 of 2018 D.S. Sidar S/o Mayaram Sidar Aged About 54 Years Presently Posted And Working As Block Education Officer, Tamnar, Block Tamnar, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

---- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of School Education, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Under Secretary, Department Of School Education Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Director, Directorate Of Public Instructions, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur Chhattisgarh

4. Collector Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

5. District Education Officer Raigarh, District Raigarh Chhattisgarh.

6. Parsu Ram Bhoi Block Education Officer, Saraipali, District Mahasamund Chhattisgarh.

----Respondents For Petitioner :

Mr. B.D. Guru, Advocate For State :

Mr. Dheeraj Wankhede, Govt. Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice P. Sam Koshy Order on Board 12/10/2018

1. The challenge in the present Writ Petition is to the order Annexure P/1 dated 04.10.2018 whereby the services of the petitioner has been transferred from the post of Block Education Officer, Tamnar to the post of Principal, Govt. Higher Secondary School, Oraimuda, Block Tamnar.

2. Without entering into the merits of the case, the counsel for the petitioner wants that the petitioner may be permitted to make a representation to the respondents raising the objections and grievances on his being transferred and the respondents in turn may decide the same as expeditiously as possible.

3. Not opposed.

4. Accordingly, the instant Writ Petition stands disposed off with liberty to the petitioner if he so chooses may prefer a detailed representation to the respondents, which in turn considering the fact that it is a case of transfer, the respondents may decide it as expeditiously as possible preferably within a period of 30 days from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order.

Sd/- (P. Sam Koshy) Judge Ved