High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/6854/2021disposed off

Gopal Krishna Raj Rai, v. State Of Chhattisgarh,

2021-12-15Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal3 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR Writ Petition (S) No. 6854 of 2021 Gopal Krishna Raj Rai, S/o Late Shri Arupa Nand, Aged About 35 Years R/o Jyotipur, Gaurella, Police Station, Tahsil And District Gaurella - Pendra - Marwahi Chhattisgarh, District : Gaurela-Pendra-Marwahi, Chhattisgarh ---Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through Its Secretary, Public Works Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralay, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

2. Engineer-In-Chief, Office Of Engineer-In-Chief, Public Works Department, Police Station And Post - Rakhi, Atal Nagar, New Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh

3. Chief Engineer, Office Of Chief Engineer, Department Of Public Works, In Front Of District Court, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh, District : Bilaspur, Chhattisgarh

4. Superintendent Engineer, Office Of Superintendent Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Bilaspur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh

5. Executive Engineer / Enquiry Officer, Office Of Executive Engineer, Department Of Public Works, Korba Division, District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh

6. Sub Divisional Officer / Presenting Officer, Department Of Public Works, Sub Division No.2, Katghora, District Korba Chhattisgarh, District : Korba, Chhattisgarh ---Respondents For Petitioner :- Mr. Abhishek Pandey and Ms. Laxmeen Kashyap, Advocates For State :- Mr. Avinash K. Mishra, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 15/12/2021

1. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that departmental enquiry is pending against him since 23/08/2011 which may be directed to be concluded expeditiously.

2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the records.

3. Be that as it may, respondents No. 4, 5 and 6/competent authority is directed to conclude the departmental enquiry pending against the petitioner within 90 days from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the matter.

4. With the aforesaid direction, this writ petition stands disposed of. No cost(s).

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge Harneet