← Library
High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPPIL/84/2018disposed off

Radhe Singh Rajput v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2018-10-23Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu2 pages

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR Writ Petition (PIL) No. 84 of 2018

1. Radhe Singh Rajput, S/o Shri Mohan Singh Rajput, aged about 58 years, Resident of Village Parpoda, Gram Panchayat Parpoda, District Bemetara (C.G.)

2. Heera Singh Rajput, S/o Shri Bhupat Singh Rajput, Aged about 44 years, Resident of Village Parpoda, Gram Panchayat Parpoda, District Bemetara (C.G.)

3. Hemant Singh Siware, S/o Shri Bishram Siware, aged about 39 years, Resident of Village Parpoda, Gram Panchayat Parpoda, District Bemetara (C.G.) ---- Petitioners

Versus

1. State of Chhattisgarh, Through Secretary, Department of Revenue and Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Naya Raipur (C.G.)

2. Commissioner, Division-Durg, District Durg (C.G.)

3. Collector, Bemetara, District Bemetara (C.G.)

4. Sub Divisional Officer (Revenue), Berla (C.G.), District Bemetara (C.G.)

5. Tahsildar, Berla (C.G.), District Bemetara (C.G.)

6. Thanuram, S/o Late Shri Bhukan Singh, aged about 72 years, Resident of Village Parpoda, Gram Panchayat Parpoda, District Bemetara (C.G.) ---- Respondents For Petitioners :

Shri Vinay Pandey, Advocate.

For Respondents/State :

Shri A.S. Kachhwaha, Additional Advocate General. Hon'ble Shri Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice Hon'ble Shri Justice Parth Prateem Sahu Order on Board Per Ajay Kumar Tripathi, Chief Justice 23.10.2018

1. The issue of encroachment raised in the present PIL has already been taken cognizance of by the revenue authorities and necessary adjudication has been

made. If the affected persons do not exhaust the legal remedy, the revenue authorities have an obligation to implement the decision. 2.

The writ is disposed off with observation as above. Sd/- Sd/- (Ajay Kumar Tripathi) (Parth Prateem Sahu) Chief Justice Judge Brijmohan