Galo @ Moti @ Dashmaniya v. State Of Chhattisgarh

Page No.1 HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR MCRC No. 3 of 2018 • Galo @ Moti @ Dashmaniya W/o Hooblal Aged About 50 Years R/o Village Dumarbhawna, Anantpur, Police Station And Tahsil Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Applicant

Versus

• State Of Chhattisgarh Through Station House Officer, Police Of Police Station Premnagar, District Surajpur Chhattisgarh, Chhattisgarh ---- Respondent _________________________________________________________ For Applicant :

Mr. Anil Gulati, Advocate.

For Respondent :

Mr. V.B. Singh, Panel Lawyer.

------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Justice Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant Order On Board 12/03/2018

1. This is the first bail application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 for grant of regular bail to the applicant who has been arrested in connection with Crime No.36/2017, registered at Police Station- Premnagar, District- Surajpur(C.G.) for the offence punishable under Section 363, 366(A), 370 (2,3,5,6) r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. Learned counsel for the applicant submits that applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in this case. No case is made out against the applicant, on the basis of the material present in the charge-sheet filed against her. Applicant is in jail since 5.4.2017 and

Page No.2 she is ready to abide by all the conditions and directions, which may be imposed while granting bail to her. Hence, it is prayed that she may be released on bail.

3. Learned State counsel opposes the bail application and submissions made in this respect. It is submitted that no case is made out for grant of bail. Hence, she is not entitled for grant of bail.

4. Heard both the parties and perused the case diary.

5. Complainant Saghram lodged FIR against this applicant and another co-accused Nohru Oraon alleging that both the accused had enticed away the minor girls namely-Jageshwari, Phool Sundri, Nanki Bai and Sunderi on pretext of providing job in Delhi and had abducted them for ulterior purpose of trafficking them, on that basis FIR has been lodged.

6. Considered.

7. On perusal of the case diary and specifically statement of one of the victims namely-Jageshwari, she was offered for placement in New Delhi by the main accused Nohru and this applicant had helped the victim in traveling along with them to New Delhi. Some job was also done by the victims, but their accounts were settled and they returned to their place because of the FIR lodged by the father of victim Jageshwari.

8. Taking into consideration on the material present in this case, I am of this view that applicant should be deserved to be benefited with grant of regular bail.

9. Accordingly, the bail application filed under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. is allowed. It is directed that the applicant shall be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.25,000/- with one surety in

Page No.3 the like sum to the satisfaction of the concerned trial Court, for his appearance as and when directed.

Sd/- (Rajendra Chandra Singh Samant) Judge Nisha