Kalipad Sana v. Hajari Lal

NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WP (227) No.55 of 2017 Kalipad Sana S/o. Sarweshwar Sana, aged about 58 years, R/o Village-Subhashnagar, Police Station & Post Subhshnagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) ---Petitioner

Versus

1. Hajari Lal, S/o. Jaichand, aged about 59 years, R/o. Village Subhashnagar, Police Station & Post Subhashnagar, Tahsil Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG)

2. State of Chhattisgarh through Collector Surguja, Ambikapur, District Surguja (CG) ---Respondents For petitioner :

Mr.Arun Kumar Bajaj, Advocate For Respondent No.1 :

Mr.Ajay Kumar Pandey, Advocate For Respondent No.2 :

Mr. Aditya Sharma, P.L.

Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order on Board 04/04/2017 Heard

1. By the impugned order, the trial Court has rejected the application filed by the petitioner/plaintiff under Order 7 Rule 14 of the Code of Civil Procedure.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the documents are necessary and it ought to have been taken on record by the trial Court.

3. Learned counsel for respondent No.1 opposes the writ petition.

4. Taking into consideration the nature of documents sought to be filed, finding recorded by the trial Court and stage during which

documents are sought to be filed, I deem it proper that the documents be taken on record subject to payment of cost of ₹ 2000/- to respondent No.1 on the next date of hearing.

5. The writ petition is allowed to the extent indicated hereinabove. However, the trial Court is directed to expedite the trial and conclude the same within a period of six months from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) JUDGE B/-