High Court Of ChhattisgarhWPS/8453/2019disposed off

Smt. Swati Nagdone v. State Of Chhattisgarh

2020-01-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri2 pages

HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH, BILASPUR WPS No. 8453 of 2019 Smt. Swati Nagdone, D/o. Late Shri Sushil Kumar Nagdone, Aged About 32 Years, Mahila Swasthya Karyakarta / A.N.M. Upswasthya Kendra Bharni District Bilaspur, R/o. Vyapar Vihar, Thana Civil Line Bilaspur, District - Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

--- Petitioner

Versus

1. State Of Chhattisgarh, Through - Avar Sachiv, Swasthya And Parivar Kalyan Vibhag, C.G. Government Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya Naya - Raipur, District - Raipur Chhattisgarh.

2. Sanchalak, Swasthya & Parivar Kalyan Vibhag, C.G. Government Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh.

3. Mukhya Chikitsa & Swasthya Adhikari, Bilaspur District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

4. Khand Chikitsa Adhikari, Samudayik Swasthya Kendra Takhatpur, District Bilaspur Chhattisgarh.

--- Respondents For the Petitioner : Mr. C.P.Soni, Advocate For the State/Respondents : Mr. Kunal Das, Panel Lawyer Hon'ble Shri Justice Goutam Bhaduri Order on Board 13.01.2020

1. The grievance of the petitioner is that she is working as A.N.M., and has been transferred from Sub-Health Center Bharni, District Bilaspur to Sub Health Center Podikhurd, District Korba on administrative ground vide order dated 23.08.2019 (Annexure P-1) which is under challenge in this petition.

2. Referring to Clause 5 of the impugned order, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the seniority and promotion aspect of the petitioner would have an adverse affect as the petitioner is working in Class III cadre post and where the seniority is maintained district-wise.

3. Given the aforesaid facts let the petitioner make a representation in this regard to the respondents within a period of two weeks from today and the respondents, in turn, shall consider and decide the same in accordance with transfer policy at the earliest preferably within a further period of 45 days.

4. Till the representation of the petitioner is decided, the effect and operation of the impugned order shall remain stayed so far as the petitioner is concerned.

5. With the aforesaid direction, the writ petition stands disposed of. Sd/- GOUTAM BHADURI JUDGE Aks